A precedent is a project done in the real world that can be used to help explain some of the ideas that will be covered in the studio or project.

Students should locate and critically evaluate precedents and demonstrate how the content of the relate to their projects.

Precedents generally fall into a number of categories:

CONCEPTUAL

ASPIRATIONAL

COMPARABLE

CONCEPTUAL PRECEDENTS

They explore ideas related to the studio through critical analysis of a wide range of largely art-based projects.

ASPIRATIONAL PRECEDENTS

They look at cutting-edge or futurist implementation of technology as related to the studio topic.

COMPARABLE PRECEDENTS

They look at nascent or current projects, often in the marketplace, that relate to the theme of the studio at a design and technological level that students can reasonably achieve within the course of the Studio.

Through a critical analysis and melding of these categories, students can develop ideas for creative and technical innovations based on an expansive understanding of the theme.

What makes a good Precedent?

MEANINGFUL

-Provides a rich social, historical or cultural context.

-Highlight examples of current relevant projects.

-Shows a novel approach.

-Shows a novel design solution.

-Exposes students to concepts, projects, and research that they are unaware of.

-Helps generate conversation about the studio topic early in the research and brainstorming process.

INSPIRING & EXCITING

-Shows a conceptual application.

-Shows a novel technical, functional, or mechanical application.

FOCUSED

GUIDING

Shows students options, avenues, and principles at any point during the design process. Precedents are useful throughout the studio, not just at the beginning.

The name of the project/device/object/installation/book etc.

Name of the creator.

A source link to the original content.

Analysis (if appropriate) of the precedent. This can be technical or conceptual.

A precedent can be a video or a series of images. Image posts should have a Title and Caption on every slide. Every Precedent should include the following in the body of the post:

POSTING PRECEDENTS

Name of the project

Name of the creator

Link

Caption

Student Examples

3

Volts

A battery is a device that stores chemical energy and converts it to electrical energy. The chemical reactions in a battery involve the flow of electrons from one material (electrode) to another, through an external circuit. The flow of electrons provides an electric current that can be used to do work.

THE BATTERY

1.8 - 3.3

Volts

A light-emitting diode (LED) is a semiconductor device that emits light when an electric current flows through it. LEDs have positive (+) and negative (-) sides to them. For an LED to work it needs to be connected to a voltage source with the correct side.

THE LED

An LED circuit requires three basic elements. The light, the wires that create a loop, and a battery. 

A switch can also be added to allow you to open and close the circuit, turning on and off the light. 

+

-

a switch is an electrical drawbridge when the bridge is up the electrons can't go anywhere

the Light Emitting Diode [LED] will provide our light

the battery holds the electrons

LED CIRCUIT BASICS

A switch is an electrical component that can disconnect or connect the conducting path in an electrical circuit. Interrupting the electric current turns the LED off, connecting the current turns it on. 

THE SWITCH

Securing the wires to the switch

Attach the metal ends of wires through holes of switch prongs

Secure each side with tape - make sure the wires aren't touching each other!

LEDs

switch

wires

batteries

LED

switch

battery

BUILDING A SIMPLE CIRCUIT

Three Kinds of Feedback

There are three forms of feedback, all of which vary in their degree of usefulness to us in the design process.

Understanding these three kinds of feedback can help us understand the conversations we have with our teams and improve our own ability to react to and use feedback to strengthen our designs.

Reaction-Based

Feedback

Direction-Based

Feedback

Critique

REACTION-BASED

FEEDBACK

This type of feedback tends to be emotional or visceral. It happens quickly and instinctively. This type of feedback is often filled with passion. It’s driven by someone’s personal expectations, desires, and values. Essentially, it’s a gut reaction.

DIRECTION-BASED

FEEDBACK

Typically begins with an instruction or suggestion. In many cases that’s also where it ends. In this form of feedback, the individual providing it is often looking for ways to bring the design more in line with their own expectations of what the solution should be.

The Characteristics of Bad Critique

What causes a critique to be “bad” is usually a set of behaviors or characteristics exhibited by those involved.

Selfish

Untimely

Incomplete

Preferential

SELFISH

Driven by the critic’s personal goals and come at the expense of the team or other individuals, specifically the designer of whatever is being discussed. In extreme cases, selfish critique comes from the motivation of the giver to not only be heard and attract attention, but also to be recognized as smarter or superior.

UNTIMELY

For the receiver to really listen, process, and make use of critique, she needs to be in the proper mindset. When critique is uninvited, it can lead to defensiveness, communication breakdowns, and often paints the person giving the critique as a “know it all.”

INCOMPLETE

For critiques to become valuable, they need to be followed by an explanation as to “why” the giver is having that reaction or foresees a certain outcome.

PREFERENTIAL

That’s when designs are torn apart not because a particular aspect isn’t working toward its objective, but rather because it doesn’t match exactly what the critique giver “likes.”

Best Practices for Giving Critique

Productive critique has the ability to strengthen relationships and collaboration, improve productivity, and lead to better designs.

Lead

with questions

Use

a filter

Talk about strenghts

Think about perspective

LEAD WITH QUESTIONS

By asking questions you give yourself more information on which to base your analysis and give stronger, actionable feedback. It can also show the designer that you’re genuinely interested in his work, and the thinking behind it, which can make discussing the project easier.

USE A FILTER

Hold on to your initial reactions, investigate them, and discuss them in the proper context. Ask the presenters additional questions if necessary to help you understand your reaction. Does the reaction relate to the objectives of the product, the audience for it, or any particular best practices that should be followed?

TALK ABOUT STRENGHTS

When we talk about aspects of a product or design that are working, there is the potential for the designer to examine those areas and abstract concepts or elements from them that could be used to strengthen other areas of the design that might not be working as well.

THINK ABOUT PERSPECTIVE

When you examine an aspect of the design and comparing your perspective to what you think the user’s might be, you’re off to a good start. From there you might find that one is clearly more appropriate than the other, or perhaps it might be best to bring both up in the discussion.

Receiving Critique Poorly

When engaging in critique, there are patterns that go against critique best practices and can hinder the critique process.



Asking for feedback

without listening

Asking for feedback

for praise or validation

Not asking for

feedback at all

ASKING FOR FEEDBACK

WITHOUT LISTENING

Asking for critique at a time when we don’t really want it or can’t do something with it leads to unproductive discussions. By not listening to our teammates, we miss valuable insights that can help improve our designs.

ASKING FOR FEEDBACK FOR VALIDATION

Whether we’re designing alone or as part of a team, it’s not unusual to want to be recognized for our creations. But it should not become our motivation for asking for feedback.

NOT ASKING FOR

FEEDBACK AT ALL

If we don’t take the initiative to ask for critique or feedback in a way that helps us understand and improve upon our ideas then we’ll miss a huge opportunity. We can’t assume that just because no one comes to us that we’ve designed the perfect solution.

Best Practices for Receiving Critique

Receiving critique in a way that is productive goes beyond just asking for it and then sitting back to let others give you their thoughts.

Remember the

purpose

Listen and think before responding

Return to the foundation

Participate

REMEMBER

THE PURPOSE

Critique is about understanding and improvement, not judgment. There is no such thing as a perfect solution. There is always room for improvement. A goal of a critique is to help identify where those opportunities are. Critique isn’t about pass or fail. It is a reflection used to inform a next step.

LISTEN AND THINK BEFORE RESPONDING

When receiving critique, it’s important that we work toward preventing any natural tendencies to form rebuttals and instead focus on listening to people’s entire thoughts.

PARTICIPATE

One of the best things a designer can do during a critique is to become a critic themselves. Being able to shift our mindset from thinking creatively to being analytical about what we’re designing is a key design skill.

CRITIQUE

Critique isn’t about that instant reaction we might feel when seeing something, or about how we would change someone’s design to better solve an issue. Critique is a form of analysis that uses critical thinking to determine whether a design is expected to achieve its desired objectives.